Noblood:Content disclaimer
From Noblood
General disclaimer – Use NoBlood at your own risk – NoBlood does not give medical advice – NoBlood does not give legal opinions – NoBlood contains spoilers and content you may find objectionable
In its ambitious mission of building a blood management and avoidance knowledge-base, NoBlood contains articles on a vast array of topics. A relatively small fraction of these topics are frequently censored by educational, governmental, corporate, parental and other filtering schemes.
- Some NoBlood articles discuss words or language that are considered profane, vulgar or offensive by some readers. See Wikipedia Profanity for more information.
- NoBlood contains many different images, some of which are considered objectionable or offensive by some readers. For example, some articles contain graphical depictions of human anatomy.
- NoBlood contains spoilers.
- NoBlood may contain triggers for people with post-traumatic stress disorder.
- It should be noted that as NoBlood is open to contributions from the public, there may at any time be graffiti present on NoBlood.
- There may be medical, legal or other information that is normally also the subject of professional opinions; NoBlood is not a substitute for seeking the help of a professional. Please note: NoBlood does not give legal or medical advice.
NoBlood's current policy is to include such content, provided it breaches neither any of our existing policies (especially Neutral point of view) nor the laws of the state of Texas in the United States, where NoBlood is hosted.
In any case, NoBlood is a work in progress, and many articles contain errors, bias, duplication, or simply need tender loving care. We encourage readers to help us fix these problems. The great majority of articles are written primarily or solely by individuals who are not subject matter experts, and may lack academic credentials in the area.
NoBlood contains obscure information that would not be covered in a conventional encyclopedia. NoBlood's coverage of subjects is patchy, based on the whims of its volunteer contributors. Readers should not judge the importance of topics based on their coverage in NoBlood, nor assume that a topic is important merely because it is the subject of a NoBlood article. See also: Wikipedia Verifiability.
